Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dreadlion
Yes Bounty ,she is selfish cause yu don't make a child for yu , i mean it's not like buying something that yu want, she knew that there was a lot of risks for the babies to die but she didn't care, and now one of the baby died and the other one is suffering and may also die.Yu don't make a baby for yourself, you are giving life and yu must protect that life, give good education, affection and care : that's the real , true love .
|
No parent I know of, who conciously makes a decision to have a child, does so without some basic desire to derive joy and satisfaction from caring for and loving that child. In that regard, I believe that we do, in a way, make children for ourselves. We make them to carry on our family name, to see a likeness of ourselves, and to have another life with which to share our love.
All parent's take risks by bringing life into this world. Do you know all the things that can go wrong during pregnancy, after childbirth, not to mention during every stage of that childs life after that? Should parents be concerned that they are morally remiss by wanting to have a child in todays society which is rife with war, disease, and strife?
Quote:
|
If she wasn't so selfish she wouldn't have taken so much risks with the life of babies, and would worry about the future of those children knowing that she probably won't live long enough give them an education , love and care what they deserve. A child need a mother and a father , i didn't hear about father neither.
|
I cannot see anything wrong with giving life. Life is a gift from God. Yes some people are born into less fortunate circumstances, but their life is still a gift. No human being has the right to say that another person should not have been born. We don't know how long that other child will live. Their have been babies born premature in very feeble condition who have gone on to thrive and lead productive, normal lives. Who is to say that the birth of that child won't serve some good in this world? No human can make that judgement.
Like I said earlier, we don't know what kind of support system she has that could help care for that child. From the story, we do know that she was some kind of professor, and I'm assuming that means that she lives fairly comfortably. So providing for the child, to me, doesn't seem like an issue. As for love, I don't see why she wouldn't be able to love the child. The ability to love doesn't diminish with age. If that were the case, then many grandparents wouldn't have the significance which they do.
I will agree with you, that the ideal family structure of a marred mother and father, is in my opinion, the right way to go. If this woman intentionally didn't follow that route, then I would be inclined to disagree with how she went about it, from that perspective.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dreadlion
We have a different point of view , you think that god allows everything to happen ...
|
Everything on the planet that happens, happens because God has allowed it to happen. We can't presume to know why God allows certain things to happen. All we can say is that, it happened, therefore, He must have allowed it to happen for some reason. I agree with you, that he doesn't support the bad things that happen nor is it His wish that people suffer etc. I don't think that view is a fatalist one per se. The Bible teaches that in the end, God takes action which sets everything right, and which is fair to all. Everybody gets treated fairly by Him when judgement, reward and consequence is meted out.
All this is to say that for this lady, I won't condemn her because she wanted children, nor would I condemn the child that was born - life is life and it is blessed by God. I agree though, that if she did stray from the ideal of having a present father etc. then she went about things the wrong way.